Often, you will get asked if one of your papers is listed in the references of the manuscript, so the new study will be in your field.You should only accept the peer review if you feel you have expertise in the topic of the paper, even if you are not an expert in all the techniques used.Your peer review will go into the section labeled "comments to the authors" - often by simply copy/pasting it into the appropriate box.Tags: Mathematics Problem Solving ExamplesEssays To Write AboutUnder Cope Heaven EssayCause And Effect Essay Thesis StatementSystem Of Checks And Balances EssayIs An Sat Essay Score Of 10 Good
This page contains a bunch of guidelines and tips for doing a great job on a peer-review. Building up a few colleagues you trust to share peer reviews makes you both better writers!
Peer-reviewing is a vital part of every professional writer's life. Start acting like a professional now, and your results will start looking professional much sooner!
By regularly doing peer reviews, you will start to think like the peer reviewer who will criticize your paper, so it will make you a better writer. And, to be honest: it can feel really great to be in the power seat sometimes!
Not only can performing a peer-review earn you bonus points for some class projects, but it will also improve your paper!
Elisabeth Bik is a Research Associate at the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Stanford University's School of Medicine.
She received her Ph D at Utrecht University in The Netherlands and worked at the Dutch National Institute for Health and the St. When not in the lab, she can be found working on her blog microbiomedigest.com, an almost daily compilation of papers in the rapidly growing microbiome field, or on Twitter at @Microbiom Digest. It is the part of the scientific process where our peers will have a chance to review our work, check it, comment on it, and - most importantly - determine whether it's good enough to become a permanent part of the scientific legacy.In your review, the most important thing to keep in mind is to remain friendly and reasonable.You should feel no regret publishing your review under your full name.It's the list that I wished I had access to when I started my first peer review.Here we go: As I am reading the manuscript for the first time, I will have a text editor open in which I immediately write down small comments on specific parts of the manuscript, such as a typo in line 15 or an unclear sentence in the introduction.It took years of practice to be comfortable enough to suggest more serious edits to other people's manuscripts, such as flaws in the design of the study, lack of controls, and over-interpretation of results. To help the inexperienced peer-reviewer, I've made a list of general questions to ask when you are reading the paper.Even now, many years and about hundred peer reviews later, I am still not always sure if my reviews strike the right balance between being critical and fair. Asking these questions should help you form an opinion about the paper, even if you have no idea where to start.However, I will always accept requests to re-review a manuscript for the second time, and give priority to requests from journals where I serve in the editorial board.Publons has been a great resource for me to keep track of all my peer reviews.On the journal's website, there is usually also a box where you can give specific comments to the editor; these will not be forwarded to the authors.Here you can state your personal opinion, or any issues you do not want to share with the authors.