Tags: Close Reading Essay RubricVisual Argument Analysis EssayWrite Essay ExampleDisorganized Schizophrenia EssaysWilliam Faulkner As I Lay Dying EssayThesis Statement For Computer CrimesStand And Deliver Essay Questions
For the above reasons, I feel the United States should reduce its nuclear arsenal.Nuclear weapons derive their power from the energy released when a heavy nucleus is divided, called fission or when light nuclei are forced together, called fusion.
Also, a great amount of United States citizens were needlessly exposed to high levels of radiation.The first nuclear chain reaction occurred in December 1942, at the University of Chicago.Soon after the first bomb test, atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.Nor have they been crucial assets in the cold war developments, alliance patterns, or the way the major world powers have acted in times of crisis (Cameron 64). The main question is, would there actually have been another world war if these weapons did not exist? A nuclear war would be costly and destructive (Cameron 65). Billions of dollars are wasted in taxes, each year, to pay for nuclear weapons.The United States has spent about four trillion dollars for its nuclear arsenal since government supported work began on the atomic bomb in 1940 (Schwartz 1).The United States built up massive nuclear weapons arsenals and developed highly sophisticated systems of delivery and defense.Today’s intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) carry one or more multiple, independently targeted reentry vehicles (MIBVs), each with its own nuclear war head.Anyone with the experiences of World War II behind them would not want to repeat the horror of that. Even before the nuclear bomb had been perfected, world war had become spectacularly costly and destructive, killing over fifty million people world wide (Cameron 66). Our government wastes over thirty-three billion dollars a year of our tax money.