The components model of addiction appears to be a more updated framework for understanding IA as a behavioral addiction, not only conceptually but also empirically.Moreover, this theoretical framework has recently received empirical support from several studies, further evidencing its suitability and applicability to the understanding of IA.
The components model of addiction appears to be a more updated framework for understanding IA as a behavioral addiction, not only conceptually but also empirically.Moreover, this theoretical framework has recently received empirical support from several studies, further evidencing its suitability and applicability to the understanding of IA.It is concluded that there is no consensual definition for IA.Tags: Solve Any Math Problem CalculatorAqa Applied Business CourseworkHollins Mfa Creative WritingRutgers Essay Question HelpHelp Creating A Business PlanGoing Over Common App Essay Word LimitPhd By ThesisSolving Radical Equations Practice ProblemsComparison Contrast Essay SportsFraser Institute Essay Competition 2012
However, as noted above, it has also been argued that the Internet may simply be the means or “place” where the most commonly reported addictive behaviors occur.
In short, the Internet may be just a medium to fuel other addictions.
A critical approach to definition and characterization Generally speaking, IA has been characterized by excessive or poorly controlled preoccupation, urges, and/or behaviors regarding Internet use that lead to impairment or distress in several life domains.
IA is a problematic behavior akin to pathological gambling that can be operationally defined as an impulse control disorder not involving the ingestion of psychoactive intoxicants.
Likewise, the very concept of addiction does not have a unique all-encompassing and widely accepted definition, let alone as applied to the concept of IA.
Edit Essay Management Online Time - Internet Addiction Essay Outline
Despite the controversies, IA has been referred to across the psychological, psychiatric, and neuroscientific literature by the adoption of different terms and nomenclatures such as Internet addiction disorder, among others.
The topic has generated a great deal of debate, particularly in relation to how IA can be defined conceptually as well as the many methodological limitations.
The present review aims to further elaborate and clarify issues that are relevant to IA research in a number of areas including: definition and characterization, incidence and prevalence rates, associated neuronal processes, and implications for treatment, prevention, and patient-specific considerations.
Nonetheless, the similarities between IA and pathological gambling were essentially in terms of psychopathological symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and global functioning.
Although individuals with IA and pathological gambling appear to share similar psychological profiles, previous research found no overlap between these two populations, Despite the fact that initial conceptualizations of IA helped advance the current knowledge and understanding of IA in different aspects and contexts, it has become evident that the field has greatly evolved since then in several ways.