Even Presidents and citizens of the United States in the seventeenth century cared about animals. Animals deserve more rights because they have emotions, wrongfully experimented on and abused.
If animals don't have rights, does it follow that it is right to treat them however we like?
Discuss in relation to at least two approaches to normative ethics.
Humans are superior, non-human animals are inferior. Maiming and injuring an animal is no different to eating it.
Available at: https://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Animal Rights Beliefs (SR) provides a polemic disagreeing with Bentham’s basis of animal rights. [online] Available at: Ethics of Animal Research (Simon Festing and Robin Wilkinson) provides an insight into the ethics of animal research, including a look at public opinion and the animal welfare regulations.
Ringach discusses the arguments made by animal rights activists about marginal cases – how do we compare the moral value of a baby, or brain damaged person to a mouse or monkey. Our text book clarifies that “virtue ethics promotes a particular kind of person—a virtuous or noble person—who provides a role model for those who wishes to be moral” (Mosser, 2011).Therefore, relationship with animals, from a virtue ethicist’s standpoint, would support virtuous or moral values.Animal Liberation (Peter Singer) was an immensely influential book which discussed the ethics of animal use (including animal research). Hills concludes with a graded scale of animals rights. It is often considered the forerunner to the animal liberation movement. Animal rights philosophy is distinct from proponents of animal welfare who argue that we must provide adequate conditions for animals in our care – a position held by the RSPCA among others. (Alison Hills) is an objective assessment of the case for whether animals should have rights and what rights those should be. The Case for Animal Rights (Tom Reagan) is another major piece of philosophical writing which argues for animal rights on the basis of their similar cognitive abilities. In Chapter 18, Smith creates his argument in favour of animal research on the basis of human rights and duties. The scientific community has often been the driving force for these improvements, arguing that better conditions for animals was conducive to better, more replicable, scientific results. Hills discusses their ability of mind, whether all animals should be regarded as equal, and what that means. That is the way of a whole human being.” Abraham Lincoln.Over time animals have been exploited and lost their freedoms. [online] Available at: moral relevance of human intelligence (Dario Ringach) – this blog post by Prof. Animal Rights “I am in favor of animal rights as well as human rights.