Hijackings, bombings, and assassinations on different continents of the world may seem like isolated attacks, but they reflect an easy reliance on violence as a way to promote social, political, and religious change.They are elements of a pervasive "end justifies the means" philosophy being followed to its most perverse conclusions.
Hijackings, bombings, and assassinations on different continents of the world may seem like isolated attacks, but they reflect an easy reliance on violence as a way to promote social, political, and religious change.They are elements of a pervasive "end justifies the means" philosophy being followed to its most perverse conclusions.Tags: The London AssignmentCase Studies For Business StudentsHero Essay TipsContoh Makalah Critical Book ReportAp Bio Photosynthesis Essay QuestionGood Topics To Write An Argumentative Essay OnStructure Of A Persuasive EssayUsing Quotations In An Essay WorksheetEssay ArrangementFriendship Experience Essay
Instead we are being victimized by an international terror network bent on crippling American morale. In Romans 13, the Apostle Paul says, "he who resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves.
For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do what is good and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good.
Democratic governments, accustomed to dealing within a legal structure, often find it difficult to deal with criminals and terrorists who routinely operate outside of the law.
Yet deterrence is just as much a part of justice as proper enforcement of the laws.
In conclusion, both the terrorist groups and their host nations are truly enemies of the American government when they capture and kill U. civilians for military and foreign policy purposes. Based upon the Apostle Paul's teaching of government in Romans 13, terrorists should be classified as common criminals in their host countries.
But they are not prosecuted by host countries and are often carrying out the military policy and foreign policy of that country.Their governments do not think of them as breaking civilian laws and thus do not prosecute them. If an anti-Syrian terrorist group were based in the United States, we would prosecute those terrorists as enemies of the state. And they would be illegal since they're carrying out activities reserved for Congress and the President.Only governments have a foreign policy and war-making strategies.Some news commentators have been unwilling to call terrorism what it is: wanton, criminal violence.They blunt the barbarism by arguing that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter." But this simply is not true.Terrorism has been called the "new warfare." But terrorists turn the notion of war on its head.Innocent non-combatants become the target of terrorist attacks.Encouraged by their latest success, terrorists usually try again.Appeasement, Churchill wisely noted, always whets the appetite, and recent successes have made terrorists hungry for more attacks.Governments who give sanctuary and even give approval have often adopted the attitude that terrorists do them no harm so why should they move against the terrorist organizations?In fact, they are not seen as a threat because terrorist groups are acting out the host government's policies.