Tags: Thesis On Foreign Direct Investment In GhanaCustom Writing Services AcademicProject Managing SoftwareBusiness Plan For Dance StudioHrm Topics For DissertationWho Can Write My EssayNaed/Spencer Dissertation SCorporate Business PlanSatan As A Hero Essay
Ultimately, when the benefits and harms of using animals for testing purposes, it is evident that animals should not be used for experiments. Moreover, animal testing has led to many horrible abuses and misleading results due to the fact that animals' organism does not match the complexity of human bodies.
Animal testing or animal experimentation is a necessary evil. Others believe animal testing should cease as society evolves past the need to experiment on living creatures. It rings especially true for those who adopt a vegan lifestyle and believe animals should have the same rights as people in terms of value of life and so forth.
Although animal testing has ceased in some cosmetic companies and label their goods as not animal tested, most companies, especially pharmaceutical companies, rely on animals to test drugs and vaccines in order to promote evolution of medicine but refrain from putting human lives at risk.
Animal testing is not only for the benefit of the humans but is also beneficial to the animals themselves. As long as people do not come up with a serious alternative to animal testing, humankind is forced by its very condition to perform tests on animals. [Read More] Work Cited Animal Rights and Vivisection. Major medical milestones that depended on animal research. Perspectives and future on testing for abuse liability in humans. [although the ASPCA] fulfills its mission through nonviolent approaches" (ASPCA). [Read More] Works Cited American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA).
Nevertheless, their suffering is not in vain, as even more people (and even animals) benefit from the exploit. In the 1880's, the emergence of bacteriology and immunology hinged on experiments on living animals (Animal Pp).…… The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition; 4/22/2004; Pp. In fact the ASPCA was the first humane organization that has been granted "legal authority to investigate and make arrests for crimes against animals…
This essay will show the pro and con sides of animal testing/animal experimentation.
Does it remain as unavoidable or can society move past animal testing and find new ways to test products and medicines? 'The Conflict Over Animal Experimentation: Is The Field Of Battle Changing?
'Basic Research: Issues with Animal Experimentations'.
Legal and professional accountability In Canada there are Research Ethics Boards (REBs) that have the power to authorize or reject funding for experiments with animals; when animal research proposals do not meet with proper ethical requirements, the REBs can put a halt to the experiments (Tremayne-Lloyd, et al., 2007, p. The law in Canada -- which should be imitated in other countries that do not now have laws protecting animals -- allows that an overseeing regulatory agencies like the College of Chiropractors of Ontario (CCO) can "reprimand members and/or suspend or revoke licenses to practice" (Tremayne-Lloyd, 57). [Read More] Works Cited American Association for Laboratory Animal Science.
By using animals in research, and through animal research science learns how certain chemicals "interact with living systems"; this knowledge can be "translated into protection of humans, animals, and the environment from toxic levels of natural -- as well as man-made -- exposures (SOT, 6).
In this paper, I will present both sides of the argument and……